Can I Be Charged With a Historic Sexual Offence?

The BBC have recently reported that the police case file of Russel Brand has been submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) for Review. The allegations against Mr Brand are historical which means non recent. Historic sexual offences are often alleged to have take place many years prior to the report being made to police however, there is no specific definition as to what counts as ‘historic’. 


A historic sexual offence can relate to any type of sexual offending including rape, sexual assault, and sexual offences against children. It is often that the complainant makes the report to the police as an adult, but was a child when the offending is said to have taken place, but this is not always the case and adults can make allegations of sexual abuse they may have suffered historically but when they were aged 18 or over.


Historic offences can be a one of offence, or it can be a pattern of abuse that is alleged to have occurred over a period of time. For example, familial child sexual abuse happening throughout the childhood of the complainant.


The allegations made against Russel Brand are said to date throughout the height of his career from 2006 to 2016, they are made by women who have come into contact with him during this period. Statements issued by the police and CPS make clear that they are committed to thoroughly investigating any sexual offence no matter how long ago it is said to have occurred. 

Proving a Historic Offence

At Eventum Legal we often speak to people who are accused of historic sexual offences, some of which date back as far to the 1970’s. There is understandably confusion as to what evidence could possibly exist when there has been such a passage of time. It would be correct to assume there are no forensics but what about other types of evidence?


There may be people who were around during the time period of the alleged offending, this could be other family members, friends or work colleagues. Although they do not have to have seen the offence taking place, they may be able to provide evidence as to what the complainant and the suspect were like at the time, the way they acted and whether they ever suspected something unusual taking place. 


Witnesses can also be people who are in the complainant’s life in the present time, usually they are disclosure witnesses, people the complainant has spoken to about the alleged offences often prior to them having been reported to the police. The purpose of disclosure witnesses is to add credibility to what the complainant has then gone on to tell the police. Disclosure witnesses can be directly related to the complainant, or they can be professionals such as counsellors, GP’s or therapists that the complainant may have been seeing over a period of time before informing the police of any alleged offences. 


This leads on to third party material and evidence that may exist by way of documentation; school records, counselling notes, therapy notes, photographs or diary entries that may lend credibility and strength to allegations made against the suspect. 


The same types of evidence apply to the defendant, and as defence lawyers we want to gather any potential evidence as soon as possible to discredit the allegations being made against our client. 

The Law in Historic Sexual Offences


There are three main pieces of legislation which can apply to sexual offence cases: the Sexual Offences Act 1956, the Indecency with a Child Act 1960 and the Sexual Offences Act 2003. Any offence which was committed prior to May 2004 will be charged under one or both of the earlier acts. 


However, sentencing for historic sexual offences isn’t straight forwards. A person being sentenced for an offence that happened when the 1956 or 1960 act was in force cannot receive a punishment any worse than what would have been given at the time the relevant law was in place, this has been reinforced by Article 7 of the European Convention of Human Rights. But the sentencing judge can refer to the current sentencing guidelines to assess the harm caused to the complainant and the culpability of the defendant. Therefore, referring to new and old law will apply when determining sentence in historic sexual abuse cases.


There are of course various factors that may apply in historic cases as is it often the case that the person prosecuted for the offence is not the same person today as they once were. Circumstances change, and we all age. In some cases, in particular if there has been a long period between the offence taking place and a conviction and sentence, the offender may be quite elderly. Judges are not obliged to take that into account when sentencing but may do so, depending on the circumstances, for example if they are very ill or frail.


At the other end of the age scale, judges have to consider the youth of an offender at the time of the offence. In some cases, the offence will have been committed while the offender was under 18, but they are sentenced after they have become an adult. In these circumstances the judge will consider the age and maturity of the defendant at the time of the commission of the offence. 


Can I be charged with a historic sexual offence?


In short, the answer to this question is yes, the police and the CPS will treat any allegation of sexual abuse seriously regardless of the age of the complaint. The number of historic sex crime allegations made in the UK is on the rise. It’s estimated that of the 20% increase in reported sex crimes throughout the UK, over a third of them are historic cases. The number of historic sex crime allegations made in the UK is on the rise.


There are many issues however that can arise in such cases such as the lack of memory of potential witnesses, key witnesses may be deceased, and also the memory of the complainant may be in question which can cause concerns for both the prosecution and defence, but more so the jury who ultimately decide whether a person is guilty or not guilty following their consideration of the evidence and guidance on the law given to them by the judge during the trial. A jury has to be sure that a person is guilty before they convict them and a lot of doubt can be created in historic sexual offence cases, choosing the correct legal team to investigate matters on your behalf will be what can lead successfully to the creation of such doubts.


I Have Been Accused of a Historic Sexual Offence What Should I Do?


It would be a mistake to assume that just because the allegation dates back some time that the police or CPS will not take the matter seriously. Historic sexual offences are given just as much time, resources and expertise as recent sexual offences, and therefore obtaining legal advice is very important.


We have seen in recent years following the cases of Jimmy Saville, Ralph Harris and Harvey Weinstein that prosecutions will commence for historic sexual offences, and these highly publicised cases have led to a sharp increase in historic complaints being made to the police throughout England and Wales.


Getting a grip on a sexual offence allegation as soon as possible is beneficial. It is widely accepted that where a suspect instructs for legal representatives to take a pro active approach as soon as possible, before charges are considered, they stand a much better chance of not being charged at all.


Where it is in the best interests of our clients we strongly advise early intervention with the police and CPS with the aim to prevent charges, or to negotiate lesser charges for our clients. This cannot be more crucial in historic sexual offence cases where there is clearly bound to be some serious evidential issues that can be brought to the attention of the reviewing lawyers.


Your reputation can be quickly and irreparably damaged by rumours and speculation surrounding any allegations of sexual misconduct, so it’s important that you contact specialist sexual offence defence lawyers right away.


If you, a friend or family member is currently under police investigation for a historical sexual offence then get in touch with our friendly team for a free and strictly confidential chat. We aim to put an action plan in place for your case and offer legal advice and support throughout.

Request a Call Back

We Can Help With

By Jessica Wilson April 22, 2025
Has your case been listed for pre-trial review? Are you concerned about what the hearing may entail? Our team have put together this short fact sheet which provides some guidance as to why a pre-trial review may be listed and what happens in the courtroom. Pre-trial reviews are not always necessary, however in cases which may have complex issues, be anticipated to be lengthy trials, or issue have arisen during trial preparation between the parties, then a pre-trial review is likely to be required. What is a Pre Trial Review? A pre-trial review is exactly what the name suggests, it is an opportunity for the court review the case prior to trial. The judge will ensure that both parties have met previous directions set by the court, and that there is no outstanding issues or reasons which may cause a delay to the trial. If there are any issues that have arisen between the parties they will be aired and the judge, where required, may set directions to the prosecution and defence with the aim being to resolve the problems, and to enable trial to begin and run effectively. Issues that can arise during trial preparation may include: 1. Applications to introduce bad character , this can be of the defendant or any other trial witnesses. 2. Applications to introduce hearsay evidence 3. Problems with witnesses 4. Delays caused by either part, where material should have been served and hasn't. 5. Applications for disclosure of documents which the defence may need and they are being withheld. Do I need to attend my pre-trial review? Yes, the defendant in a case is almost always required to attend their pre-trial review. It can also be useful for the defendant's attendance so that they can remain fully involved and aware of the process and decisions being taken in their case. You will not be asked any questions at the hearing but the judge may wish for you to acknowledge the outcome of the hearing and directions set, particularly if there is work for the defence team to carry out. Will my barrister attend my pre-trial review? You must always be represented at any court hearing. Our team take great pride in our meticulous preparation for all court hearings and your barrister would be instructed to attend your pre-trial review, with a detailed brief which would detail any issues we have with the prosecution or delays that are affecting our ability to prepare for trial. Do my witnesses have to attend my pre-trial review? No, your witnesses do not have to attend your pre-trial review. No evidence will be heard during the hearing, it is to establish readiness for trial only, resolve issues that could potentially cause delays, and to give the court confirmation that the current date listed for trial will be able to remain. How long does a pre-trial review hearing take? How long a pre-trial review hearing takes depends on the nature of the case and whether any issues require addressing by the judge. The court will usually want to process pre-trial review hearings quickly, and in sexual offence or domestic abuse cases the hearings can last anywhere from 10 minutes to one hour. How Eventum Legal can help Our team take a meticulous approach to trial preparation and will always be alert to any issues that could affect your case. We take a no stone unturned approach and we are not afraid to challenge decision of the CPS at hearings before the courts. We have select barristers which we work regularly with when defending sexual and domestic violence cases so you are provided with a strong and experienced team who are dedicated thorough preparation and presentation of your case. If you have a pre-trial review hearing approaching and are unrepresented, or feel that your current legal team are not making the progress required then contact us for a free initial consultation where we will assess your case, circumstances and the future of any court hearings.
By Jessica Wilson April 18, 2025
Falsely accused of a sexual or domestic offence? Our team answer some frequently asked questions.
By Sylvie Smith April 16, 2025
Social media is increasing the risk of unintentional viewing of illegal material, leading to arrests and convictions.
More Posts