Changes To Domestic Abuse Laws in 2025

The laws surrounding domestic abuse in the UK are constantly evolving, and 2025 marks a significant change in how certain offences are managed. If you or someone you know has been accused of domestic abuse, particularly controlling or coercive behaviour, it’s essential to understand these new legal developments. 

One of the most notable changes is that offenders sentenced to 12 months or more for controlling or coercive behaviour will now be placed under Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA), a system previously used mainly for violent and sexual offenders. This has been introduced by Victims and Prisoners Act 2024 and came into force at the beginning of February 2025.

While the intention is to improve victim protection and reduce reoffending, these changes also introduce new challenges for those facing allegations.

As criminal defence specialists at Eventum Legal, we ensure everyone has the right to a fair defence. In this article, we’ll break down the latest changes in domestic abuse laws, what they mean for those accused, and how we can help protect your rights. If you need a domestic violence defence lawyer, please contact our team today.

Overview Of The 2025 Legal Changes

Inclusion of Controlling or Coercive Behaviour


Until now, domestic abuse laws have focused heavily on physical violence. However, coercive control, a pattern of behaviour that isolates, intimidates, or manipulates a partner, has now been brought under the same legal umbrella as physical violence. This means that those convicted of coercive control could face the same legal consequences as those found guilty of physical assault.


The government aims to acknowledge that domestic abuse isn’t always about physical harm. Psychological and emotional abuse can be just as damaging, and lawmakers want to ensure victims receive the protection they need.


However, coercive control cases can be complex. The definitions of such behaviour can be broad, and what one person sees as control, another may see as normal relationship behaviour. 


This means that innocent individuals could face serious accusations based on misunderstandings or personal disputes. But, this is where Eventum Legal can help you, we are defence lawyers across the UK.


Implementation Of MAPPA For Specific Offenders


The biggest change in the law is the decision to place those sentenced for coercive control offences under MAPPA if their sentence is 12 months or longer.


MAPPA is a framework designed to monitor offenders after release to reduce reoffending risk. While it was traditionally used for violent and sexual offenders, this new expansion means that anyone convicted of coercive control could face strict monitoring conditions, even if they’ve served their sentence.


For those who have been accused of domestic abuse, this is a very important point to be aware of. MAPPA means that your movements, communications, and activities could be closely watched, impacting your daily life long after your sentence.

Understanding MAPPA: What It Means for Defendants


What is MAPPA?


MAPPA (Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements) is a system that brings together the police, probation services, and social services to monitor individuals considered a risk to the public.


There are three levels of MAPPA management:


  • Level 1 (Ordinary Agency Management): The individual is monitored within standard probation and police processes.
  • Level 2 (Multi-Agency Management): A range of agencies coordinate to ensure closer monitoring.
  • Level 3 (High-Risk Management): The highest level of monitoring, often used for the most serious offenders.


Those convicted of coercive control could be placed at any of these levels, depending on the case details and perceived risk.


How Will MAPPA Affect Those Convicted of Coercive Control?


Being managed under MAPPA could mean:


  • Regular check-ins with probation officers and police
  • Movement restrictions or conditions on where you can live or who you can contact
  • Electronic tagging or other surveillance measures
  • Ongoing risk assessments, even after completing a sentence


These conditions could feel excessive and unfair for individuals who never intended harm and may have been convicted based on misunderstandings or weak evidence.


Concerns From A Defence Perspective


From a legal perspective, the main concern is whether MAPPA is a proportionate response for those convicted of coercive control.


While protection for victims is essential, we must also ensure that the legal system does not unfairly penalise individuals who may not pose a genuine risk. The consequences of MAPPA management could make reintegration into society extremely difficult for those who have served their time.

The Expanding Definition of Domestic Abuse & Its Implications


Controlling Or Coercive Behaviour: A Broader Scope of Offences


Coercive control can include:


  • Preventing someone from having contact with family and friends
  • Restricting access to money or resources
  • Making threats or intimidating behaviour
  • Constant monitoring or surveillance of a partner


These new definitions mean that more people could face accusations, and in some cases, relationships with normal tensions or arguments could be misinterpreted as coercive control.


Challenges In Proving or Defending Against Allegations


The biggest challenge in these cases is proving intent. Unlike physical violence, coercive control is often based on interpretation rather than clear-cut evidence.


This can lead to:


  • Wrongful convictions based on one-sided accounts
  • Difficulties in proving intent (e.g., was it controlled or just a bad argument?)
  • The risk of people being convicted based on minimal evidence


Defence Strategies Under the New Laws


Key Legal Defences Against Allegations of Coercive Control


Common defences include:


  • Lack of intent: Proving there was no intention to control or harm
  • False accusations: Demonstrating inconsistencies in the accuser’s statements
  • Context of behaviour: Providing evidence that specific actions were mutual decisions in the relationship


Challenging MAPPA Designation and Restrictions


If convicted, it may be possible to challenge a MAPPA decision, mainly if it imposes unnecessary restrictions. A legal challenge can be made if you can demonstrate that:


  • The monitoring conditions are excessive
  • You do not pose a risk
  • Your conviction was based on limited or unreliable evidence


Importance of Early Legal Representation


Getting legal advice early is crucial. The sooner you speak with a defence lawyer, the better your chances of fighting the charges and avoiding harsh penalties.


What Should Those Accused of Domestic Abuse Do?


Understanding Your Rights Under the New Legal Framework


If you have been accused of coercive control, you must understand your rights under the law. You have the right to defend yourself, including access to legal representation, a fair trial, and the opportunity to present evidence in your defence.


Steps to Take if Facing an Accusation or Charge


If facing an accusation or charge, you should take several necessary steps. It is essential to avoid contacting the accuser, as any communication could be used against you in legal proceedings. Gathering evidence, such as messages, emails, and financial records, can be important in building your defence. Seeking expert legal advice from a solicitor specialising in domestic abuse defence will ensure you receive the necessary guidance to navigate the legal process effectively.


Contact Eventum Legal For More Domestic Violence Defence Guidance! 


The new 2025 domestic abuse laws introduce significant changes, particularly in how coercive control cases are handled. While these laws aim to protect victims, they also raise concerns for those falsely accused.


At Eventum Legal, we are committed to providing strong legal defence for those facing domestic abuse allegations. Contact our team today if you need advice or representation; your future and reputation are worth protecting. 

We Can Help With

By Jessica Wilson April 22, 2025
Has your case been listed for pre-trial review? Are you concerned about what the hearing may entail? Our team have put together this short fact sheet which provides some guidance as to why a pre-trial review may be listed and what happens in the courtroom. Pre-trial reviews are not always necessary, however in cases which may have complex issues, be anticipated to be lengthy trials, or issue have arisen during trial preparation between the parties, then a pre-trial review is likely to be required. What is a Pre Trial Review? A pre-trial review is exactly what the name suggests, it is an opportunity for the court review the case prior to trial. The judge will ensure that both parties have met previous directions set by the court, and that there is no outstanding issues or reasons which may cause a delay to the trial. If there are any issues that have arisen between the parties they will be aired and the judge, where required, may set directions to the prosecution and defence with the aim being to resolve the problems, and to enable trial to begin and run effectively. Issues that can arise during trial preparation may include: 1. Applications to introduce bad character , this can be of the defendant or any other trial witnesses. 2. Applications to introduce hearsay evidence 3. Problems with witnesses 4. Delays caused by either part, where material should have been served and hasn't. 5. Applications for disclosure of documents which the defence may need and they are being withheld. Do I need to attend my pre-trial review? Yes, the defendant in a case is almost always required to attend their pre-trial review. It can also be useful for the defendant's attendance so that they can remain fully involved and aware of the process and decisions being taken in their case. You will not be asked any questions at the hearing but the judge may wish for you to acknowledge the outcome of the hearing and directions set, particularly if there is work for the defence team to carry out. Will my barrister attend my pre-trial review? You must always be represented at any court hearing. Our team take great pride in our meticulous preparation for all court hearings and your barrister would be instructed to attend your pre-trial review, with a detailed brief which would detail any issues we have with the prosecution or delays that are affecting our ability to prepare for trial. Do my witnesses have to attend my pre-trial review? No, your witnesses do not have to attend your pre-trial review. No evidence will be heard during the hearing, it is to establish readiness for trial only, resolve issues that could potentially cause delays, and to give the court confirmation that the current date listed for trial will be able to remain. How long does a pre-trial review hearing take? How long a pre-trial review hearing takes depends on the nature of the case and whether any issues require addressing by the judge. The court will usually want to process pre-trial review hearings quickly, and in sexual offence or domestic abuse cases the hearings can last anywhere from 10 minutes to one hour. How Eventum Legal can help Our team take a meticulous approach to trial preparation and will always be alert to any issues that could affect your case. We take a no stone unturned approach and we are not afraid to challenge decision of the CPS at hearings before the courts. We have select barristers which we work regularly with when defending sexual and domestic violence cases so you are provided with a strong and experienced team who are dedicated thorough preparation and presentation of your case. If you have a pre-trial review hearing approaching and are unrepresented, or feel that your current legal team are not making the progress required then contact us for a free initial consultation where we will assess your case, circumstances and the future of any court hearings.
By Jessica Wilson April 18, 2025
Falsely accused of a sexual or domestic offence? Our team answer some frequently asked questions.
By Sylvie Smith April 16, 2025
Social media is increasing the risk of unintentional viewing of illegal material, leading to arrests and convictions.
More Posts