What is Bad Character Evidence?

As a suspect or defendant, you may have heard the term ‘bad character evidence’ discussed between your legal representative and or with you. In a criminal case, bad character is a term used to describe a person who has a history of misconduct other than what they are being investigated or prosecuted for. This misconduct does not have to be a previous criminal conviction.

 

Bad character does not just apply to a defendant, there can also be non-defendant bad character which could relate to the complainant of a crime, or witnesses in proceedings. 


Legal definition of bad character

 

Section 98 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 defines bad character as evidence of, or a disposition towards misconduct, other than evidence which has to do with the alleged facts of the offence with which the defendant is charged, or is evidence of misconduct in connection with the investigation or prosecution of that offence.

 

Misconduct is further defined by the Criminal Justice Act as the commission of an offence or other reprehensible behaviour. This may include previous convictions, and/or behaviour which may amount to a criminal offence but was never investigated or prosecuted. Reprehensible behaviour does not have any particular legal definition and is therefore considered on a case-by-case basis, considering the particular circumstances of the case and the alleged reprehensible behaviour. 


Will the jury hear about my previous convictions?


The jury cannot just be told about a defendant’s previous convictions, for this information to be presented to the jury the Crown Prosecution Service would have to make a bad character application, prior to trial.

 

Bad character evidence is only allowed to be introduced in criminal proceedings if one or more of the following gateways are met:


  • all parties to the proceedings agree to the evidence being admissible, - this means that both the prosecution and the defence agree for the bad character evidence to be disclosed.


  • the bad character evidence is adduced by the defendant himself or is given in answer to a question asked by him in cross-examination and intended to elicit it – this usually arises where the defendant themselves discloses their previous convictions in open court during their trial so that the jury hear it directly from them.


  • it is important explanatory evidence – it is important for the jury to hear the details of a defendant’s bad character to ensure they understand a particular aspect of the current case against the defendant.


  • it is relevant to an important matter in issue between the defendant and the prosecution. This can include circumstances whereby the defendant has committed offences of the same kind before, or where they have committed offences which show they have a history of being untruthful.


  • it has substantial probative value in relation to an important matter in issue between the defendant and a co-defendant.


  • it is evidence to correct a false impression given by the defendant. This can include where in an interview under caution or when giving evidence in the witness box, they give information which is proved to be untrue such as a defendant who may suggest they are an honest person, but then have a conviction for theft.


  • the defendant has made an attack on another person’s character. If a defendant attacks another person’s character, where they in fact themselves are not of good character, this could lead to the prosecution being allowed to explain this to the jury.


  • Even is one of the above gateways are met, there are complex legal arguments which defence lawyers can advance to stop bad character being disclosed to a court during a trial. Responding correctly to an application for the bad character of a defendant to be admitted is crucial, and often requires detailed responses which deal with legal technicalities.


What should a bad character application include?


A bad character application is a two page document which requires the lawyer completing the form to confirm firstly the details of the case and the ground on which they are relying on to introduce the bad character evidence. They must then go on to complete questions 1-3 which would include any legal argument, or law being relied on.


Once the application is served on the court and other party a response will be drafted and submitted by the defendant's legal team. Where it is not agreed a hearing at court will take place and it will be for the judge to decide, upon hearing legal arguments from both sides as to whether the bad character evidence is allowed to be disclosed to the jury during the trial.

What will happen if bad character evidence is allowed?


If the judge allows the prosecution to introduce the bad character evidence of a defendant then defence lawyers should take all possible steps to ensure that this is delivered to the jury in the least harmful way possible. This may include the defendant admitting the bad character evidence within their evidence and beating the prosecution to it. This is a tactical decision that should only be made with the advice of an experienced legal team.


Non-Defendant Bad Character

 

During criminal proceedings it may become apparent that a witness or the complainant themselves has a history of misconduct which may or may not include previous criminal convictions. In this instance the defence can apply to introduce the bad character of the witness or complainant which may assist the defendant and undermine the case against them. To do this a similar form to that above is completed and served on all parties.


What about good character?

 

Evidence of character can also relate to good character. This would apply in circumstances where a defendant has no previous convictions and can be helpful to show two things during a criminal trial:

 

1.    that the defendant is less likely to have committed this offence because they are a person of good character and;

2.   a defendant with no convictions is additionally entitled to a good character direction as to their credibility where, before trial, they asserted their innocence at a police station or during their evidence given at trial on the witness stand.

 

The direction for good character is referred to as a Vye direction, the name comes from a court of appeal case R v Vye [1993]. It is crucial your legal team ensure that this direction is given to the jury, where the circumstances apply.

 

How can we help you?

 

Avoiding bad character being admitted during criminal proceedings is essential and it is therefore very important your legal team understand and can apply the law surrounding this area and can prepare strong legal arguments to protect you from this.

 

It is also important that the bad character of witnesses or the complainant is explored and dealt with correctly, this in turn has the potential to impact an accused’s case dramatically.

 

At Eventum Legal our team have been challenging bad character applications in the Magistrates and Crown Courts for many years and understand exactly how to deal with issues of bad character evidence that can arise during criminal proceedings, particularly proceedings relating to sexual offences.

 

If you would like to discuss any issues that may arise or have arisen in your case, and you are concerned about how this may affect your trial then we can hold a free initial case conference with you to discuss our approach and how we can help. You can complete our online enquiry form following which we will contact you, or you can call and speak to a lawyer now on 0161 706 0602.

 

 

We Can Help With

By Jessica Wilson April 22, 2025
Has your case been listed for pre-trial review? Are you concerned about what the hearing may entail? Our team have put together this short fact sheet which provides some guidance as to why a pre-trial review may be listed and what happens in the courtroom. Pre-trial reviews are not always necessary, however in cases which may have complex issues, be anticipated to be lengthy trials, or issue have arisen during trial preparation between the parties, then a pre-trial review is likely to be required. What is a Pre Trial Review? A pre-trial review is exactly what the name suggests, it is an opportunity for the court review the case prior to trial. The judge will ensure that both parties have met previous directions set by the court, and that there is no outstanding issues or reasons which may cause a delay to the trial. If there are any issues that have arisen between the parties they will be aired and the judge, where required, may set directions to the prosecution and defence with the aim being to resolve the problems, and to enable trial to begin and run effectively. Issues that can arise during trial preparation may include: 1. Applications to introduce bad character , this can be of the defendant or any other trial witnesses. 2. Applications to introduce hearsay evidence 3. Problems with witnesses 4. Delays caused by either part, where material should have been served and hasn't. 5. Applications for disclosure of documents which the defence may need and they are being withheld. Do I need to attend my pre-trial review? Yes, the defendant in a case is almost always required to attend their pre-trial review. It can also be useful for the defendant's attendance so that they can remain fully involved and aware of the process and decisions being taken in their case. You will not be asked any questions at the hearing but the judge may wish for you to acknowledge the outcome of the hearing and directions set, particularly if there is work for the defence team to carry out. Will my barrister attend my pre-trial review? You must always be represented at any court hearing. Our team take great pride in our meticulous preparation for all court hearings and your barrister would be instructed to attend your pre-trial review, with a detailed brief which would detail any issues we have with the prosecution or delays that are affecting our ability to prepare for trial. Do my witnesses have to attend my pre-trial review? No, your witnesses do not have to attend your pre-trial review. No evidence will be heard during the hearing, it is to establish readiness for trial only, resolve issues that could potentially cause delays, and to give the court confirmation that the current date listed for trial will be able to remain. How long does a pre-trial review hearing take? How long a pre-trial review hearing takes depends on the nature of the case and whether any issues require addressing by the judge. The court will usually want to process pre-trial review hearings quickly, and in sexual offence or domestic abuse cases the hearings can last anywhere from 10 minutes to one hour. How Eventum Legal can help Our team take a meticulous approach to trial preparation and will always be alert to any issues that could affect your case. We take a no stone unturned approach and we are not afraid to challenge decision of the CPS at hearings before the courts. We have select barristers which we work regularly with when defending sexual and domestic violence cases so you are provided with a strong and experienced team who are dedicated thorough preparation and presentation of your case. If you have a pre-trial review hearing approaching and are unrepresented, or feel that your current legal team are not making the progress required then contact us for a free initial consultation where we will assess your case, circumstances and the future of any court hearings.
By Jessica Wilson April 18, 2025
Falsely accused of a sexual or domestic offence? Our team answer some frequently asked questions.
By Sylvie Smith April 16, 2025
Social media is increasing the risk of unintentional viewing of illegal material, leading to arrests and convictions.
More Posts