Can Dementia Exempt You From Criminal Responsibility? The Latest on the Mohammed Al Fayed Case

In recent news the son of Mohammed Al Fayed has come forward and disclosed that despite sexual assault allegations being made against the former Harrod’s owner and files being sent to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) once in 2008 relating to three complaints, and in 2015 which related to one complaint, the CPS brought no action against him due to him suffering with dementia, despite him being "as sharp as a tack" when it came to business. 

Sexual allegations resurfaced following the death of Mohammed Al Fayed, leading to worldwide news reports, and a BBC documentary Al Fayed: Predator at Harrods. The documentary examined various sexual assaults on women and girls. Now it seems that allegations had been made when Al Fayed was alive, but due to his health no further action was taken was taking by the Crown Prosecution Service.


On three occasions - in 2018, 2021 and 2023 - the CPS was asked for what is called early investigative advice, but the matters were not pursued further by police. Early investigative advice is where the police request for the CPS Lawyer to review the case against the accused and the work they have completed to date, the CPS then provide advice to the police on the necessary steps they need to take to enable the CPS to make the correct decisions when it comes to charge. Early investigative advice is very common in serious or complex cases, but also where there are high profile individuals involved.


Mohammed Al Fayed’s son said individuals surrounding Al Fayed helped him avoid further police probing "on the grounds he was mentally incapacitated" and had dementia, but that when he returned to business affairs he was "as sharp as a tack". We can almost be certain that medical professionals would have been assisting Al Fayed in obtaining his diagnosis and providing "evidence" of this to law enforcement.


Now following his death more than 90 complainants have come forward to the Metropolitan police to report the sexual abuse they suffered at the hands of Mohammed Al Fayed, including the most serious sexual offence of rape


There is no doubt that Mohammed Al Fayed was one of the most powerful men in the world, and had the most trusted team around him that not only potentially facilitated the alleged offences but helped to also cover them by lending their support to his dementia claims.  


Dementia and Criminal Proceedings


Dementia is often considered a condition where people suffer memory loss, but there is more to it than this. Dementia presents other symptoms which can put a person accused of a criminal offence immediately on the backfoot. The problems that may arise for someone suffering with dementia include difficulty with problem solving, organising and communicating ; all of which are required to ensure a person understands the allegations against them and can provide instructions to their defence team, formulate their plea and process information.


Mental capacity is crucial in criminal proceedings, a person who has mental capacity is able to make decisions at a certain time where required to do so. Someone who cannot do this is said to lack capacity, and one condition where this can be apparent is with dementia.


The fact that someone has a mental health condition or disorder may have a bearing on the decision to prosecute, but it may not and the bar is very high to pass often requiring in depth medical evidence and reports.


“English law describes those who lack sufficient capacity to participate meaningfully in criminal proceedings as being unfit to plead”. 


The law developed in 2004 with the introduction of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999, which seen the use of intermediaries in criminal proceedings throughout courts in England and Wales.  The role of the intermediary is to assist those with communication difficulties, however in cases where dementia is a key issue, their assistance is not going to aide memory recall and there really is very little assistance in cases where a defendant or witness lacks memory due to dementia.


Article 6 ECHR - The Accused's Right to a Fair Trial


There is a strong argument that a person who is suffering with dementia and does not have any memory, or struggles to remember events properly will not have a fair trial. The CPS as a public authority should identify disadvantages that disabled defendants may experience, and consider what steps could remove or minimise them, or what adjustments could be made. Whether this process was correctly followed or considered when the police requested charging advice from the CPS in respect of Mohammed Al Fayed we do not know, and if so what the results of the assessment was. 


The Decision To Prosecute


Prosecutors must apply the Director's Guidance on Charging. The investigator must notify the prosecutor that the suspect's mental health condition or disorder may be a live issue. This must be done clearly in the request for early advice or for a charging decision, stating the grounds on which it is based and drawing the prosecutor's attention to any relevant material. This information may potentially come from different sources: not only the suspect, but their friends, family, defence representative or a professional involved in their treatment or care. In the Mohammed Al Fayed's case it is likely that various sources would have provided the police and CPS with evidence of his condition and when considering the evidential threshold their evidence  would have been a very relevant and key factor.


What Might Happen Next in the Mohammed Al Fayed Case?


Although I am sure a trial by media, which can be dangerous in itself when court proceedings may commence, will continue to play out in respect of Mohammed Al Fayed, the reality is he can never be tried, convicted or exonerated of the alleged offences. However, those who are still living may be investigated and prosecuted in respect of the part they played in any alleged historic offence


The developments that have taken place within the law from the 1980's have changed the way in which the police and CPS view historic alleged sexual offences and therefore, there is no doubt that police investigations into those still living, who are alleged to have been involved will be taken seriously and pursued where there is sufficient evidence to do so.


We Can Help With

By Jessica Wilson April 22, 2025
Has your case been listed for pre-trial review? Are you concerned about what the hearing may entail? Our team have put together this short fact sheet which provides some guidance as to why a pre-trial review may be listed and what happens in the courtroom. Pre-trial reviews are not always necessary, however in cases which may have complex issues, be anticipated to be lengthy trials, or issue have arisen during trial preparation between the parties, then a pre-trial review is likely to be required. What is a Pre Trial Review? A pre-trial review is exactly what the name suggests, it is an opportunity for the court review the case prior to trial. The judge will ensure that both parties have met previous directions set by the court, and that there is no outstanding issues or reasons which may cause a delay to the trial. If there are any issues that have arisen between the parties they will be aired and the judge, where required, may set directions to the prosecution and defence with the aim being to resolve the problems, and to enable trial to begin and run effectively. Issues that can arise during trial preparation may include: 1. Applications to introduce bad character , this can be of the defendant or any other trial witnesses. 2. Applications to introduce hearsay evidence 3. Problems with witnesses 4. Delays caused by either part, where material should have been served and hasn't. 5. Applications for disclosure of documents which the defence may need and they are being withheld. Do I need to attend my pre-trial review? Yes, the defendant in a case is almost always required to attend their pre-trial review. It can also be useful for the defendant's attendance so that they can remain fully involved and aware of the process and decisions being taken in their case. You will not be asked any questions at the hearing but the judge may wish for you to acknowledge the outcome of the hearing and directions set, particularly if there is work for the defence team to carry out. Will my barrister attend my pre-trial review? You must always be represented at any court hearing. Our team take great pride in our meticulous preparation for all court hearings and your barrister would be instructed to attend your pre-trial review, with a detailed brief which would detail any issues we have with the prosecution or delays that are affecting our ability to prepare for trial. Do my witnesses have to attend my pre-trial review? No, your witnesses do not have to attend your pre-trial review. No evidence will be heard during the hearing, it is to establish readiness for trial only, resolve issues that could potentially cause delays, and to give the court confirmation that the current date listed for trial will be able to remain. How long does a pre-trial review hearing take? How long a pre-trial review hearing takes depends on the nature of the case and whether any issues require addressing by the judge. The court will usually want to process pre-trial review hearings quickly, and in sexual offence or domestic abuse cases the hearings can last anywhere from 10 minutes to one hour. How Eventum Legal can help Our team take a meticulous approach to trial preparation and will always be alert to any issues that could affect your case. We take a no stone unturned approach and we are not afraid to challenge decision of the CPS at hearings before the courts. We have select barristers which we work regularly with when defending sexual and domestic violence cases so you are provided with a strong and experienced team who are dedicated thorough preparation and presentation of your case. If you have a pre-trial review hearing approaching and are unrepresented, or feel that your current legal team are not making the progress required then contact us for a free initial consultation where we will assess your case, circumstances and the future of any court hearings.
By Jessica Wilson April 18, 2025
Falsely accused of a sexual or domestic offence? Our team answer some frequently asked questions.
By Sylvie Smith April 16, 2025
Social media is increasing the risk of unintentional viewing of illegal material, leading to arrests and convictions.
More Posts