Case Success: Sexual Harm Prevention Order Refused in a Case Concerning Sexual Activity with a Child

Our client has avoided a Sexual Harm Prevention Order being made against him, following conviction for the offence of sexual activity with a child.  This has enabled our client to return to his family home and be involved in his daughters life, something the police and Social Services had done everything possible to prevent. 

Whilst represented by his previous legal team our client was unfortunately convicted after trial in the Magistrates Court of Sexual  Activity with a Child contrary to section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. We were instructed after the trial to appeal this conviction and to represent our client at his sentencing hearing. Efforts were made to adjourn sentence pending the outcome of appeal but the court proceeded to sentence which they were entitled to do. 

We prepared the client's case for sentence whilst liaising with the Crown Court regarding the appeal. 

The offence

Sexual Activity with a child is an offence contrary to section 9 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. This particular case related to an allegation against our client that he had inappropriately touched a girl’s thigh and caused her to kiss him on the lips. The complainant was 14 years old and was known to our client. The offence is alleged to have taken place in a busy football stadium surrounded by other people, CCTV and the football stewards. There were no eyewitnesses. 

The allegation was made immediately when the complainant left the stands to go to the toilet, whilst away from our client and other family members and friends the complainant made a phone call to her mother who she made those initial disclosures to. 
Our client was subsequently arrested, interviewed and charged. During this process the duty solicitor was used under the Legal Aid Scheme. He denied all allegations made against him. 

Sentence 

The maximum sentence that the court could impose in this instance was 6 months imprisonment. If the case was sent to the Crown Court the maximum sentence increases greatly to 14 years imprisonment, but this is of course a sentence reserved for the most serious section 9 offences. The minimum sentence that could be imposed in such a case is a low level community order. 

In addition to the punitive element of the sentence the court must consider, upon application from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS), whether or not a Sexual Harm Prevention Order is required. In this case an application for a SHPO was made, and in addition a Football Banning Order, which would prevent our client from attending football matches. 

What is a Sexual Harm Prevention Order?


A Sexual Harm Prevention Order is commonly made in cases which concern sexual offending and where the offence is listed within schedule 3 or 5 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003. A section 9 offence is listed within schedule 3.


The purpose of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order is to protect the public or a certain group of the public from further sexual harm caused by the defendant section 103A(2) Sexual Offences Act 2003.


To make a Sexual Harm Prevention Order the court must be satisfied that the defendant presents a risk of sexual harm, and that an order is necessary to prevent this harm.


In our case, the consideration was whether the defendant posed a risk of sexual harm to children. The details of the case are a key factor when the courts are considering a SHPO together with any previous convictions and the assessment of risk presented by the Probation Service. The proposed prohibitions in our case looked to prevent contact with children (including our client’s own child) without the supervision of someone who is aware of the offence, amongst other prohibitions this was the main one which would have caused our client and his family severe upset and disruption. 

Football Banning Order


A Football Banning Order Application was also made in this case by the CPS against our client. Their argument was that violence should include sexual violence. Following submissions by the defence, that sexual offending certainly did not fall into the category of offending in which Football Banning Orders were aimed to prevent, the court agreed not to make such an order.


Our Client’s Sentence


At court our client was represented by his barrister, Mr Damian Warburton of Holborn Chambers who we instructed to represent our client. Damian advanced legal arguments in respect of both the SHPO application and the Football Banning Order, the Magistrates agreed with the defence and refused both applications made by the CPS. The court concluded with a sentence of a 12-month community order. This will require our client to undertake a certain number of hours of unpaid work, a Rehabilitation Activity Requirement, and a low amount of prosecution costs. 


We will now continue to prepare our client's case for appeal against conviction in the Crown Court.

How we Can Help You


In all cases we take the initial view of working with our client to avoid conviction, however, where a client pleads guilty or is convicted after a trial we must proceed to prepare thoroughly for sentence.


Thorough preparation for sentencing of sexual offences can not be underestimated, the Crown Prosecution Service will apply to prohibit a defendant from various every day activities which can have a serious impact on the way in which their lives are lived, these prohibitions can prevent a defendant from their social media use, internet use, device use and contact with their children, or children of family members. But it is important to understand that a SHPO is not mandatory and that they can be challenged.


If you have been made subject to a Sexual Harm Prevention order, or maybe currently under investigation or facing court proceedings where such an order is likely to be applied for, then contact our team to discuss this. We may be able to completely oppose the order, or challenge certain prohibitions to ensure you are not overly restricted. We can also apply the same approach to Sexual Risk Orders, which the police can apply to impose before a charging decision or court proceedings.


Our initial discussion with you is free of charge and strictly confidential. Our friendly team will guide you step by step through the legal process which applies to your case and what we can do represent you and achieve the best possible outcome.


Contact Us

We Can Help With

Man and woman with backs to each other.
By Jessica Wilson February 22, 2025
Accused of controlling or coercive behaviour and want to know what exact behaviour this includes? Our lawyers explain.
CPS logo with person behind.
By Jessica Wilson February 17, 2025
Understanding how the CPS make charging decisions can be crucial to establishing the pre charge defence approach to your case.
Criminal Court of Justice
By Jessica Wilson February 13, 2025
Preparing for a rape trial can be distressing, and emotionally draining. Our team are a support system for our clients.
More Posts
Share by: